As the United States approaches its pivotal Presidential election on November 5, 2024, African leaders, scholars, and citizens alike watch closely, aware that the outcome will have deep repercussions for international cooperation, security, and development across the continent.
In an exclusive interview with News Central TV, Professor Etse Sikanku, an Associate Professor of Journalism and Communication at Ghana’s University of Media, Arts, and Communication, provided insights into the potential impacts a Kamala Harris or Donald Trump administration could have for Africa, touching on critical areas such as trade, security, and human rights.
According to Prof. Sikanku, Africa’s key stakes in the election revolve around “international cooperation and global issues,” especially considering the U.S.’s influence as a superpower.
“An American presidency has huge implications for global peace, security, and international development,” Sikanku remarked. Africa has long relied on U.S. support, which he notes will vary widely depending on the candidate who assumes office.
Sikanku suggests that a Harris administration would promote a more empathetic and cooperative approach towards Africa, marked by respect for “human rights across the world” and particular attention to women’s empowerment. Harris’ background and her awareness of communal values that shape African life might make her more inclined to support socially conscious policies and African development, potentially pushing for increased American trade and technology investment.
“A Harris administration,” the don states, “is likely to pursue more trade in Africa and encourage more American businesses to invest, especially to counter China’s influence.”
In contrast, Sikanku points out that a Trump administration would likely prioritise America’s own interests, viewing Africa less as a partner and more through an inward-focused, subjugatory lens. Sikanku notes, “Policies such as stricter immigration, lesser trade with Africa, and less respect for the continent will dominate his administration.” Trump’s approach might lead to further marginalisation of Africa, with a focus on security partnerships that align with American counterterrorism objectives but less engagement on economic or humanitarian fronts.
Sikanku also highlights the role of media in shaping U.S. perceptions of Africa. “Media narratives often frame Africa as a ‘dark continent’ filled with conflict and poverty,” he explained. He suggests that while Trump supporters might buy into these dated stereotypes, Harris, backed by her Democratic ties, might be more likely to challenge these perceptions and shift the narrative towards Africa as a region of opportunity and partnership.
Professor Sikanku adds that a Harris victory could hold symbolic significance beyond policy, especially for Black communities worldwide, providing an inspiring figure in Kamala Harris for young Black women. “They will look at Harris and know they can achieve anything they put their mind to,” he said. Conversely, a Trump win, Sikanku argues, might embolden an inward-looking, authoritarian approach that contrasts with Africa’s values of communal cooperation and diplomacy.
As Africa watches the U.S. election unfold, the continent’s future relations with one of its most significant international partners hang in the balance, with implications that will resonate well beyond November.