The Human Rights Watch (HRW) has stated that opposition leaders, journalists and commentators in Rwanda are being persecuted by judicial authorities for their speeches and opinions, intensifying a culture of intolerance towards dissent,
In a damning report published on Wednesday, Human Rights Watch said it had monitored court documents, verdicts and judges’ arguments against several Rwandans who have ended up behind bars due to the country’s “abusive legal framework”.
Researchers also pointed to violations of the right to freedom of expression after analysing content posted on YouTube by several reporters now on trial, and interviewing 11 opposition members.
According to HRW’s Central Africa director, Lewis Mudge, People are not free to express themselves on anything that might be seen as challenging the government or what it says.
In the past decade, YouTube had emerged as the last virtual frontier for voicing dissent on national issues after print media and then radio stations became strictly monitored by Rwandan authorities.
Now, its popular users are also being targeted, HRW said.
“Most people on YouTube are being silenced and given heavy sentences that would be associated more with state security crimes,” said Mudge. “And it’s getting worse in the sense that every time you think that a space can’t be constricted more, it continues to do so,” he added.
HRW highlighted the case of popular YouTuber, Dieudonne Niyonsenga, also known as Cyuma Hassan. His Ishema TV channel, followed by more than 15 million viewers, ran reports on critical issues from human rights abuses to corruption.
Last November, he was convicted on appeal to seven years in prison on charges of forgery, impersonating journalists, and hindering public works for being outside during lockdown without valid press accreditation.
The Rwandan judiciary ruled that by presenting himself as a journalist without accreditation, Niyonsenga misled the public and committed a crime of forgery.
The YouTuber was also initially charged for “humiliations of national authorities” – a charge no longer a criminal offence in Rwanda since 2018, which was later dropped.
The rights group also stressed that “requirements for journalists to register are rarely, if ever justifiable, and in a context of repression like Rwanda, they are used politically to curtail speech”.
As of March 9, TV Ishema was no longer in operation, HRW reported.
There are some grounds for the government to seek to restrict vitriolic speech similar to that which paved the way to the 1994 genocide of 800,000 people, mostly Tutsis but also moderate Hutus, “but current laws and practice go far beyond this purpose,” HRW said in its report.
Freedom of expression is guaranteed by Rwanda’s constitution, but there are restrictions based on public orders and good morals, among others. HRW said it believes that the judiciary helps exploit such “ill-defined restrictions” to curtail freedom of expression.
A government spokesperson, Yolande Makolo, rejected HRW’s accusations stressing that Rwanda’s judicial system “operates fairly and transparently”.
“Everyone is equal before the law and no one is prosecuted for having political opinions,” Makalo said. “The sustained harassment of Rwanda by Human Rights Watch does nothing more than entrench a negative stereotype about justice and human rights in Africa,” she added.
HRW also accused the justice system of abusing its power against opposition leaders.
